A ray of hope shines for women battling infertility as the Indian government reconsiders its ban on donor gametes (eggs or sperm) in surrogacy for married couples, following Supreme Court interventions highlighting potential legal flaws. This move holds significant promise for numerous women grappling with medical conditions not explicitly covered by the current regulations.
The Legal Tussle:
- Rule 14(a) of the Surrogacy (Regulation) Rules, 2022, restricted married couples from using donor gametes even in cases where medical conditions prevented them from conceiving biologically.
- This sparked outrage, particularly among women suffering from conditions like Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome (MRKH) or autoimmune disorders, rendering them unable to produce eggs.
- Twelve such women challenged the rule in the Supreme Court, questioning its discriminatory nature and violation of their reproductive rights.
Government's Recourse:
- Responding to the court's concerns and the petitioners' arguments, the Centre informed the Supreme Court that it's actively re-evaluating Rule 14(a) in light of past judgments.
- This reconsideration follows the court's earlier ruling in October 2023, allowing a woman with MRKH to use donor eggs for surrogacy despite the restrictive rule.
Potential Impact:
- If the Centre revises the rule based on the court's guidance, it could potentially broaden access to surrogacy for countless couples struggling with infertility due to diverse medical conditions not currently covered.
- This would be a significant victory for women facing limitations like MRKH, POI (premature ovarian insufficiency), and other conditions impacting egg production.
Additional Considerations:
- This case also throws light on the ongoing debates surrounding surrogacy regulations and their discriminatory tendencies, often impacting women disproportionately.
- Beyond addressing the specific restriction on donor gametes, the Supreme Court is also considering challenges to the Surrogacy Act itself, seeking to address discriminatory provisions based on age, marital status, and sexual orientation.
Looking Ahead:
While the Centre's reconsideration offers a promising sign, the final resolution rests with the Supreme Court. The upcoming decisions regarding both the challenged rule and the overall Act hold immense significance for countless individuals and couples yearning to build families through surrogacy.
This story merits continued attention as it unfolds, potentially reshaping the landscape of surrogacy and reproductive rights in India.
(With input from news agency language)
If you like thi
s law news, share it with a friend!
0 Comments