STOCK MARKET UPDATE

Ticker

6/recent/ticker-posts

HC: Competitive Exams shall avoid ambiguous Questions, there should be one clear Answer,

 Legal system in India: What are the types of Law in the Indian Legal  System? | - Times of India

Facts of the Case

The instant petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of India presents the following factual matrix. The petitioners are aspirants under the Gujrat Administrative service
examinations. The petitioners appeared in the preliminary examinations and essentially found three questions in the master key requiring a re-look.

Arguments

The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner relied on the the decision of the Allahabad High Court in the case of Sunilkumar Singh and others v. U.P. Public Service
Commission and others decided by the Division Bench of the Allahabad High Court to present their extensive arguments to convince the court to overlook the judicial restraints and
to give relief.

The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent reiterated the court's judicial constraint by citing the court's recent decision in Jigar Bharatsingh Kshtriya v. the State of Gujarat. While presenting their judgement, the court referred to the Supreme Court's decision in Ran Vijay Singh and Others v. State of Uttar Pradesh. 

Observations by the Court


This court is aware that the Supreme Court has cautioned it to exercise great restraint and to be a reluctance to entertain arguments which challenge the correctness of the key answer in these particular petitions. However, the court pointed out that the petitioner's prima-facie position, in this case, is that of victims of ambiguous question framing in a time-constrained examination.

Further, in the case of Kanpur University through Vice Chancellor and others v. Samir Gupta and others 1983 4 SCC 309, which has been followed by the decisions while warning of judicial restraint, the court has recommended that there must be a system of avoiding ambiguity in questions. Accordingly, the two questions appear to be ambiguous in the present case.

Judgement


Nevertheless, on a perusal of the factual situation, the court despite its awareness of the limitations opted to grant the petitioners interim relief permitting them to appear in the exam
with directions. 


Social media is bold.


Social media is young.

Social media raises questions.

 Social media is not satisfied with an answer.

Social media looks at the big picture.

 Social media is interested in every detail.

social media is curious.

 Social media is free.

Social media is irreplaceable.

But never irrelevant.

Social media is you.

(With input from news agency language)

 If you like this story, share it with a friend!  


We are a non-profit organization. Help us financially to keep our journalism free from government and corporate pressure

Post a Comment

0 Comments

Custom Real-Time Chart Widget

'; (function() { var dsq = document.createElement('script'); dsq.type = 'text/javascript'; dsq.async = true; dsq.src = '//' + disqus_shortname + '.disqus.com/embed.js'; (document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0] || document.getElementsByTagName('body')[0]).appendChild(dsq); })();

market stocks NSC