STOCK MARKET UPDATE

Ticker

6/recent/ticker-posts

Assad officer found guilty of crimes against humanity in torture trial

 Sweeping.jpg 

A bizarre official notice issued by a Buxar Civil Court Officer to clean temples near the city’s Circuit House has sparked a huge controversy as it falsely alleged that the Chief Justice of the High Court of Patna gave such a direction. 

While the order dated Jan 6 was withdrawn in another order issued on Jan 10, by then the Court staff already cleaned a temple.

The Jan 6 order was signed by the in-charge officer (admin) of the Buxar civil court. It says, “As directed, in the light of direction of Hon’ble the Chief Justice of Patna High Court, Patna, all Presiding Officers of Courts alongwith their respective Court’s Staff shall be cleaning Temples in the morning on 09.01.2022, situated beside Circuit House if they are not engaged in special sitting of their respective Court on 09.01.2022 for hearing on Final Form, as directed earlier. This is for kind information & needful (sic).”

Following the order, the Bhairav temple was cleaned by Court staffers on Jan 9.

When the controversial order came to the notice of Advocates & other people, they questioned its nature. 


According to sources, the notice was brought to the notice of Chief Justice Sanjay Karol, who ordered it to be withdrawn immediately. On Jan 10, a day after the temple was cleaned, another notice was issued.

“The notice dated 6/1/2022 issued by in-charge officer (admin) where all the judicial officers & staff of civil court were directed to remain present for cleaning temples is withdrawn forthwith,” reads the second Order.

This notice was signed by the District Judge of Buxar & denied that the chief justice of the Patna High Court gave any direction to clean temples. It says, “No such directions were given by Hon’ble the Chief Justice of the high court of judicature of Patna (sic).”


“There appears some mischief in [the] issuance of the aforesaid notice. The said notice was also not issued under the directions/instructions of the undersigned. The matter is being [i]nquired into,” the new notice concludes. 

A source close to the District Judge told the news agency that since the notice mentioned the cleaning of a temple specifically, it sparked controversy.

The source said, “The chief justice took it seriously & instructed it to be withdrawn & issue a fresh notice".


The source further said, “In December last year, the chief justice came to Buxar & visited a few temples & historical places. Later, he went to the Circuit House as well as Barood Ghar. There is an old Bhairav temple adjacent to the Barood Ghar. The chief justice visited the temple as well.”

The source said, “He found waste dumped between Barood Ghar & the temple. He expressed displeasure & asked the judicial staffers who were present to get the area cleaned".

Dharmendra Tiwari, the Additional District Judge (ADJ) & secretary of the District Legal Service Agency has termed the January 6 notice a “clerical error”.


He told the news agency, “The district judge & I were ill. The staff had issued a notice. It was just a clerical mistake & we have withdrawn it when it came to our notice.”

Tiwari corroborated the source’s claim that the chief justice had asked the litter near the temple to be cleaned.

He said that “We informed the local municipality. Then the district judge told a court staffer that a notice should be issued in this regard, instructing the court staff to visit the temple on January 9 to monitor the cleaning process".


“The court staff may have thought [wrongly] that since the chief justice had visited the Bhairav temple, he had ordered that the temple should be cleaned. So he issued that notice,” he told the news agency.

Asked why it took four days for the notice to be withdrawn, Tiwari said, “The district judge was on leave. I was also on leave, so we could not see it earlier.”

He denied that the staff cleaned the temple. “The cleaning work was conducted at Barood Ghar only. No cleaning was conducted at the Bhairav temple,” he said. 


But some officials shared photos of them cleaning the temple on social media & the caption specifically mentioned that the Bhairav temple was cleaned. 

Source Link

Social media is bold.


Social media is young.

Social media raises questions.

 Social media is not satisfied with an answer.

Social media looks at the big picture.

 Social media is interested in every detail.

social media is curious.

 Social media is free.

Social media is irreplaceable.

But never irrelevant.

Social media is you.

(With input from news agency language)

 If you like this story, share it with a friend!  


We are a non-profit organization. Help us financially to keep our journalism free from government and corporate pressure

 

 

Post a Comment

0 Comments

Custom Real-Time Chart Widget

'; (function() { var dsq = document.createElement('script'); dsq.type = 'text/javascript'; dsq.async = true; dsq.src = '//' + disqus_shortname + '.disqus.com/embed.js'; (document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0] || document.getElementsByTagName('body')[0]).appendChild(dsq); })();

market stocks NSC