The Supreme Court Justice Aniruddha Bose in the case titled Sabita
Shashank Singh v. Shashank Shekhar Singh gives his views on can HC
dissolve Marriage by Mutual Consent while hearing a Transfer Petition.
Facts of the Case:
The respondent (Husband) had instituted a petition for dissolution of marriage under Section 13(1) (ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955
in the Family Court at Pune, Maharashtra. The petitioner (Wife) filed a
transfer petition of that divorce petition from the Family Court, Pune,
Maharashtra to the Principal Judge, Family Court, Gautam Budh Nagar,
Uttar Pradesh. The petitioner has submitted that the parental home of
the petitioner is at NOIDA and she is undergoing treatment for certain
ailment there. For these reasons, she would be unable to travel to Pune
to defend the divorce petition. After the mediation process, the parties
filed a joint application, interalia, for a decree of divorce by mutual
consent before this Court, invoking this Court's jurisdiction under Article 142 of the Constitution of India.
Court’s Observation & Judgement:
The Supreme Court held:
“While
sitting singly this Court does not have the jurisdiction to take a
decision on that plea made in the joint application. One of the
preconditions for the exercise of jurisdiction under Article 142 of the Constitution of India
in passing order or decree for doing complete justice is that the cause
or the matter in which the Court intends to invoke the provisions
thereof must be pending before it. Annulment of marriage cannot be
linked to any cause or matter pending before this Court in the facts of
the given case. The transfer petition arose out of a matrimonial dispute
between the parties, but the expression 'cause or matter pending before
it' cannot be stretched to cover all disputes originating from such
matrimonial problem that can be resolved by this Court, sitting singly,
while hearing a transfer petition.”
It further observed:
"The
joint application ought to be dealt with by a Bench comprising of two
or more Hon'ble Judges as the Hon'ble Chief Justice of India may
consider appropriate. Since the parties to the present proceeding have
otherwise settled their dispute through the process of mediation, the
transfer petition has lost its utility and stands disposed of. Let the
file be placed before Hon'ble the Chief Justice of India for appropriate
directions for giving effect to the terms of settlement entered into by
and between the parties and broadly reflected in the joint
application."
Read Judgement Here:
source ; .latestlaws.com
Social media is bold.
Social media is young.
Social media raises questions.
Social media is not satisfied with an answer.
Social media looks at the big picture.
Social media is interested in every detail.
social media is curious.
Social media is free.
Social media is irreplaceable.
But never irrelevant.
Social media is you.
(With input from news agency language)
If you like this story, share it with a friend!
We are a non-profit organization. Help us financially to keep our journalism free from government and corporate pressure
0 Comments