High Court to Registry: Maintain Confidentiality of Victims of Sexual Assaul

 

Observing that there is no requirement in law to implead the victim to any criminal proceedings, whether instituted by the State or by the accused, the Delhi High Court has directed that the Registry must carefully scrutinize all filings relating to sexual offences, to ensure that the anonymity and confidentiality of the prosecutrix/victim/survivor is strictly maintained.

The single-judge bench of Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani stressed that in order to maintain confidentiality, name, parentage, address, social media credentials and photographs of the prosecutrix/victim/survivor must not be disclosed in the filings made in court, including in the memo of parties.

"Though, if the foregoing direction is scrupulously followed, the identifying particulars would not appear in the cause-list, by way of abundant caution, the Registry must ensure that such particulars do not get reflected in the cause-list of the court in any manner, " the order reads.

The Court passed the directions in order to effectuate two legal mandates:

 -there is the unbridled right of a victim to participate in all criminal proceedings relating to the crime (Jagjeet Singh Vs. Ashish Mishra @ Monu, 2022 Latest Caselaw 315 SC)

-in so far as sexual offences are concerned, there is also a legal mandate that the victim’s identity must be kept confidential

The Court has issued the following directions with the mention that they are not intended to be exhaustive and at the stage of scrutiny, the Registry is expected to apply its mind to any peculiarities of a given case, with the aim and intent of scrupulously applying the directions of the Supreme Court in Nipun Saxena (supra).
- The name, parentage and address of family members of the prosecutrix/victim/survivor — through whom the prosecutrix/victim/survivor could be identified — must not be disclosed in the filings, including in the memo of parties, even if they are accused in the case, since this may indirectly lead to the identification of the prosecutrix/victim/ survivor;
- Since redaction of the identifying particulars of the prosecutrix/victim/survivor from the FIR, chargesheet, proceedings before the trial court and other similar records, is the duty and obligation of the authorities/court that prepare such documents; and insofar as the proceedings before this court are concerned, making complete redaction in each of those documents may not be feasible, it is also directed that the files/paper-books/e-portfolio of matters relating to sexual offences filed in this court must not be provided to any person other than the parties to the litigation, to the prosecutrix/victim/survivor and their respective counsel, after due verification of the identity credentials of such persons;

- At the stage of scrutiny of the filings, in the event the Registry finds that the identity credentials of a prosecutrix/victim/survivor are disclosed in the memo of parties or anywhere else in the filings, such filings must be returned to counsel who have filed the same, to undertake requisite redactions, before the filings are accepted;

- To obviate the dissemination of identifying particulars to any other person or agency even within the High Court, it is further directed that all service to be effected upon the prosecutrix/victim/survivor shall only be through the Investigating Officer in accordance with Practice Directions dated 24.09.2019 and not through the process serving agency, though a copy of the petition or application must be served upon the prosecutrix/victim/survivor;

- In effecting service as aforesaid, the Investigating Officer must remain in „plain clothes‟ so as to avoid any unwarranted attention;

- Furthermore, the Investigating Officer must also inform the prosecutrix/victim/survivor that they have the right to free legal-aid/representation in accordance with the mandate of the Supreme Court in Delhi Domestic Working Women's Forum vs. Union of India & Ors

-If the parties wish to cite in court any identifying particulars of the prosecutrix/victim/survivor, including photographs or social media communications etc., such party may bring the same to court in „sealed cover‟; or file the same in „sealed cover‟ or in a „pass-code locked‟ electronic folder and share the pass-code only with the concerned Court Master

 

 Social media is bold.

Social media is young.

Social media raises questions.

 Social media is not satisfied with an answer.

Social media looks at the big picture.

 Social media is interested in every detail.

social media is curious.

 Social media is free.

Social media is irreplaceable.

But never irrelevant.

 Social media is you.

 (With input from news agency language)
 If you like this story, share it with a friend!   
We are a non-profit organization. Help us financially to keep our journalism free from government and corporate pressure .