The single judge bench of Justice Karamjeet Singh of the Punjab and Haryana High court in the case of Sahid Vs State of Haryana granted bail to the accused as his name was not in the FIR.
BRIEF FACTS
The factual matrix of the case is that the present petition is filed under section 439 CRPC for the grant of the regular bail to the petitioner registered for the offenses under section 406, 420 IPC.
The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner contended that the petitioner is in custody since 12.4.2022 and the police have already presented the challan but it will take time for the trial to conclude and the petitioner has been falsely implicated as the amount in question which was deposited in the bank account was never withdrawn from the same bank account. He also claims that only '4000/- was recovered from the petitioner's possession, and he requests that regular bail be granted to the petitioner in these circumstances.
The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the state contended that after the investigation the challan has already been presented and that the amount in question was deposited in the bank account of Atula which was operated by one Tahir.
The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner contended that the petitioner is in custody since 12.4.2022 and the police have already presented the challan but it will take time for the trial to conclude and the petitioner has been falsely implicated as the amount in question which was deposited in the bank account was never withdrawn from the same bank account. He also claims that only '4000/- was recovered from the petitioner's possession, and he requests that regular bail be granted to the petitioner in these circumstances.
The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the state contended that after the investigation the challan has already been presented and that the amount in question was deposited in the bank account of Atula which was operated by one Tahir.
COURT’S OBSERVATION ;
The court after taking into consideration that the name of the petitioner was not there in the FIR dated 12.4.2022. Admittedly, after the conclusion of the investigation, the police have presented challan qua to the petitioner and all the offenses are triable by the Court of Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class. It will take a considerable time for the trial to conclude. The court granted bail to the petitioner.
CASE NAME- Sahid Vs State of Haryana
CITATION- CRM-M-23612-2022
CORUM- Justice Karamjeet Singh
DATED- 06.09.22
Read Judgment ;
Social media is young.
Social media raises questions.
Social media is not satisfied with an answer.
Social media looks at the big picture.
Social media is interested in every detail.
social media is curious.
Social media is free.
Social media is irreplaceable.
But never irrelevant.
Social media is you.
(With input from news agency language)
If you like this story, share it with a friend!
We are a non-profit organization. Help us financially to keep our journalism free from government and corporate pressure.
0 Comments