The court stated that Article 21 of the constitution of India extends the benefit of protection not only to every citizen of this country but to a person who may not be a citizen of the country.
Representative image. Photo: Pixabay
Jodhpur: The Rajasthan high court has ruled that a foreign national who is a victim of domestic violence can file a complaint against her abusive husband if the violence is perpetrated during her stay in India.
Justice Vinit Kumar Mathur dismissed the plea of Robarto Nieddu, the husband of Catherine Nieddu, seeking rejection of her complaint against him and questioning its maintainability on the ground of them being foreign nationals.
Catherine Nieddu had filed a complaint of domestic violence against Robarto Nieddu during their stay in Jodhpur in 2019. Robarto had first challenged the complaint in the court of Metropolitan Magistrate and then in the court of the Additional District and Sessions Court Judge (Women Atrocities Cases).
With both the courts rejecting the plea, Roberto then moved the high court challenging both the decisions on the grounds of maintainability of the complaint citing her not being an Indian citizen.
While arguing the case, the petitioner’s counsel submitted that the petitioner and the respondent are not Indian citizens and thus are not amenable to the jurisdiction.
Contradicting this argument, the respondent’s counsel submitted that as per Section 2(a) of the Domestic Violence Act of 2005, the definition of ‘aggrieved person’ is given, and as per the definition itself, any woman including a foreign citizen who is subjected to domestic violence can maintain an application before a trial court.
While hearing the arguments, Justice Mathur observed that the respondent is living in Jodhpur for the last 25 years and after having solemnised marriage with the petitioner, the incident which is reported in the complaint also took place at Jodhpur. Therefore, in view of definitions enumerated under sections 2 (a) and 12 of the Domestic Violence Act of 2005, it is held that the complaint of respondent Catherine Nieddu is maintainable and the high court dismissed Robarto’s petition.
The court also stated that even Article 21 of the constitution of India extends the benefit of protection not only to every citizen of this country but also to a person who may not be a citizen of the country. It added that the respondent is very much entitled to get protection of Section 12 of the Domestic Violence Act.
(PTI)
Social media is bold.
Social media is young.
Social media raises questions.
Social media is not satisfied with an answer.
Social media looks at the big picture.
Social media is interested in every detail.
social media is curious.
Social media is free.
Social media is irreplaceable.
But never irrelevant.
Social media is you.
(With input from news agency language)
If you like this story, share it with a friend!
We are a non-profit organization. Help us financially to keep our journalism free from government and corporate pressure
0 Comments