Supreme Court of India. Photo: PTI
New Delhi:
Asking IIT Bombay to adopt a humanitarian approach, the Supreme Court
directed it to allocate within 48 hours a seat to a Dalit student who
could not deposit his fees as his credit card was not functioning.
The apex court exercised its plenary powers to direct IIT to
allocating a supernumerary seat to the Allahabad boy, saying it would be
a travesty of justice if he is turned away from the Supreme Court. It
also made essential observations on the financial abilities of ordinary
people, noting at one point that many do not have “multiple credit
cards” with them to make heavy payments.
A bench of Justices D.Y. Chandrachud and A.S. Bopanna said, “This
court has before it a young Dalit student, who is on the verge of losing
a valued seat which has been allocated to him at IIT, Bombay, The
travails of the appellant has taken him from Allahabad, where he is
currently studying, to Kharagpur and Bombay and eventually to the
national capital. Having regard to the facts of the case, it would be a
grave travesty of justice to the young Dalit student who has to finally
move this court, is turned away from its portals.”
The bench noted that if the petitioner Prince Jaibir Singh, who had
an all-India rank of 864 in the SC category in the IIT entrance exam, is
not admitted in this academic year, he will be ineligible to appear for
further entrance examinations as he has attempted the exam twice,
successively.
The petitioner has said that he was allocated a civil engineering
seat in IIT Bombay but could not make payment for the seat acceptance
fee as his credit card did not work despite several efforts.
On October 15, the Union government, reported LiveLaw,
issued a brochure for joint seat allocation for academic programmes
offered by the IIT, NIT, and other engineering institutions for 2021 to
2022. The Joint Seat Allocation Authority or JOSAA portal was open for
online reporting for the first round till October 31. Within that date,
relevant documents as well as acceptance fees had to be paid. When Singh
tried to pay the fees on October 29, he failed as he was short of
funds.
In his plea, filed through advocate Pragya Baghel, Singh said that
the next day, he had tried to book the seat after his sister sent the
money but could not do so. He said he wrote several emails and made
calls to the management authorities of IITs but did not receive any
response. Failing to get any relief, he then approached the Bombay high
court seeking directions to IIT Bombay but his plea was dismissed on
technical grounds.
On November 18, the apex court came to the aid of the student and
said that the “court must sometimes rise above the law” as “who knows
10-20 years down the line he may be the leader of our nation.”
On Monday, the Supreme Court said it is of the view that this was a
“fit and proper case where the exercise of jurisdiction under Article
142 of the constitution is warranted at the interim stage”.
Article 142 deals with the enforcement of decrees and orders of the Supreme Court.
“We accordingly direct the first and second respondent (IIT Bombay)
to ensure that the seat which is allocated to the appellant shall be
allotted to him at IIT Bombay. This shall be done without disturbing any
other students, who have already been admitted,” the bench said.
The top court said that the creation of supernumerary seats in the
facts of the present case shall be subject to the admission of Singh
being regularised if any seats fall vacant as a result of exigencies,
which may arise in the course of the admission process.
“Parties shall act on the certified copy of this order and implement
these directions within a period of 48 hours that is by November 24,”
the bench said.
Article 142
During the hearing, advocate Sonal Jain, appearing for Joint Seat
Allocation Authority (JOSAA) and IIT Bombay, said that there are no more
seats available in any of the IITs across the country as the admission
process is complete. The court can pass an order under Article 142 for
allocating a seat to Singh, Jain said.
The bench said, “Look at the background of the child. He has to
borrow money from his sister after his credit card malfunctioned. Don’t
be wooden like this. We can pass an order under Article 142 but that may
not be favourable for IITs. You can adopt a humanitarian approach and
explore the possibilities. Explain this to the chairman.”
The top court also said that many seats get vacant after students
take admission in various other institutes to further their career and
the IIT should look and allocate one such seat to this student.
“Something has to be done for this student. It is elementary common
sense, which students would not like to get into IIT Bombay and not pay
Rs. 50,000 fees? It is obvious that he has some financial problems. He
has to borrow money from his sister. These students study years after
years for this exam. Look at their background,” the bench said.
Jain said that there are seven other students, who despite being
allocated the seats could not pay their fees and the court must consider
this fact.
The bench added that IITs should have a robust system in place to
rule out any such situation in the future because students from even
rural parts of the country study hard to make it through this
examination.
“Ordinary persons do not have multiple credit cards with them. They
have limited options to make payments. Otherwise, you will only have
students from metropolitan cities and not from rural parts of the
country,” it said.
(With PTI inputs)
Social media is bold.
Social media is young.
Social media raises questions.
Social media is not satisfied with an answer.
Social media looks at the big picture.
Social media is interested in every detail.
social media is curious.
Social media is free.
Social media is irreplaceable.
But never irrelevant.
Social media is you.
(With input from news agency language)
If you like this story, share it with a friend!
We are a non-profit organization. Help us financially to keep our journalism free from government and corporate pressure
0 Comments