HC issues notice to BCI on plea seeking ban on present dress code for Lawyers

  

The High Court of Allahabad has issued notice to the Bar Council of India (BCI) on a petition seeking a ban on the present dress code of black coat & robes for lawyers, even as the Lucknow bench of the HC directed the Centre & the HC Administration to file their responses on the issue by Aug 18.

A division bench of Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyay & Justice Ajai Kumar Srivastava issued the notice on Friday to the BCI on a PIL filed by lawyer Ashok Pandey. Considering the importance of the issue, it asked all the respondents to come up with their stand on the next date of hearing.

The petitioner has challenged the provisions of the fourth chapter of the BCI Rules, 1975 framed under section 49(i)(gg) of the Advocates Act 1961, alleging that the same are ultra vires (beyond the powers) to the Constitution, violating articles 14, 21 & 25.

The petitioner has demanded from the court that it should direct the BCI to frame fresh rules for prescribing a new dress code for lawyers across India in view of the country’s climatic condition.

The PIL has also sought quashing of a circular framed by the HC administration, which mandates wearing black robes for appearing before the Court.

 

Arguing before the bench, the petitioner said the present dress code of wearing a coat & a gown & tying a band around the neck is not suitable for the climatic condition of India.

He submitted that “The advocate’s band is a religious symbol of Christianity & a non-Christian cannot be compelled to wear it".

The petitioner also said, “Wearing a white saree or salwar kameez is a symbol of widows according to the Hindu culture & traditions & there was no application of mind on the part of the BCI while prescribing the present dress code for lawyers in the country.” The petitioner added, “Even a mad man will not go for a coat & a gown in summer but sadly, lawyers & judges are wearing those proudly. The black robes prescribed by the BCI & the HC administration is unreasonable, unjust, improper & violative of the fundamental rights of lawyers guaranteed under articles 14, 21 & 25 of the Constitution.”

 Source Link

 

Social media is bold. 

Social media is young.

Social media raises questions.

 Social media is not satisfied with an answer.

Social media looks at the big picture.

 Social media is interested in every detail.

social media is curious.

 Social media is free.

Social media is irreplaceable.

But never irrelevant.

Social media is you.

(With input from news agency language)

 If you like this story, share it with a friend!  

We are a non-profit organization. Help us financially to keep our journalism free from government and corporate pressure.