Where is the public in 'Two Much Democracy'
And the government is dedicated to the task of reducing this blight on our nation
If you too are among the crores of countrymen, who feel that the democracy of the country is a victim of the evil eyes of its rulers and because of this, it is constantly being marginalized, then there is even worse news for you.
That the Niti Aayog made by the Narendra Modi government in place of the Planning Commission is now not tolerating even a little democratic space left from this evil eye. The Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of the Commission, Amitabh Kant, is also looking at this space as a roadblock to the government customs.
Otherwise, there was no reason for him to say in an online program last Tuesday that 'there is too much democracy in our country', due to which many 'stringent reforms' proposed at the level of governments are not being implemented.
Although after several bitter objections, he turned back from what he had said twice, but by then she had gone so far that her intention hidden behind her could not be revealed.
In view of the future of the country, the meaning of his intention is so deep that he cannot be discharged even by calling it his personal. There are two reasons for this.
The first is that he is the CEO of an institute that plays the role of a government think tank and provides him with relevant advice on key factors of policy.
Secondly, they are in favor of adequate 'political will, courage and perseverance' for the above stringent reforms which are not possible due to 'more democracy'. Happy that the Narendra Modi government has shown courage in reforming coal, labor and agriculture sector by ignoring all disagreements and protests and is moving forward with courage and commitment in other sectors.
It is not difficult to understand here whether it be 'more democracy' or not, it is necessary that the said stringent reforms in every situation. Many observers are also saying that when they were talking about 'greater democracy', they were thus giving expression to the 'problems' faced by the government in dealing with agitated farmers against agrarian reform laws.
If this is indeed the case, it is easy to understand what kind of and how undemocratic plans are in line with their motives — especially when there are reasons to believe that they can reduce this 'more' democracy in their policy advice to the government. Can advocate to do.At the moment, it is not clear what definition of democracy was in his mind while complaining about more democracy.
But whatever it is, it does not match with the resolution of our constitution, in which democracy equals social, economic and political justice, freedom of thought, expression, faith, religion and worship, equality of dignity and opportunity to all citizens of the country. It was associated with the sacred purpose of achieving and increasing the fraternity that ensured the dignity of the individual and the unity and integrity of the nation.If we look in the mirror of this purpose, then many incidents in different parts of the country are not only embarrassing but also very disappointing.
I considered know why people are coy about saying it out loud and proud. I knew why someone who has said it in a speech, not once but twice, quite clearly,
{With input from news agency language) If you like this story, share it with a friend!
We are a non-profit organization. Help us financially to keep our journalism free from government and corporate pressure.
0 Comments