Health economists say the decline was largely because the very consumption of healthcare and other social services plummeted at the time the ministry prepared the estimates.
Patients and their attendants are seen inside Apollo hospital in New Delhi, India, September 8, 2015. Photo: Reuters/Adnan Abidi/File Photo
New Delhi: The Union health ministry recently released the National Health Accounts (NHA) Estimates 2017-2018 to the accompaniment of headlines that said out-of-pocket expenditure (OOPE) had dropped substantially in India.
Ministry officials and others celebrated this as a triumph – against the backdrop of India’s poor reputation as the country with one of the highest OOPEs in the world.
According to the NHA, OOPE as a share of total health expenditure had come down from 64.2% in 2013-2014 to 48.8% in 2017-2018 – and also 10 percentage points down from the 2016 NHA.
“One of the factors [for] this decline is the increase in utilisation and reduction in cost of services in government health facilities,” The Hindu quoted Union health secretary Rajesh Bhushan as saying.
However, there appears to be a catch.
Health economists told The Wire Science that the decline in OOPE was largely because the very consumption of healthcare and other social services plummeted at the time the health ministry prepared the estimates.
The distal cause was that in November 2016, Prime Minister Narendra Modi had announced the demonetisation of the Rs 500 and 1,000 banknotes, plunging India’s informal sector into a financial crisis.
“Demonetisation happened about six months before this survey. And by now, we have clear data suggesting how the consumption of all social services, including health services, went down,” Indranil Mukhopadhyay, who reaches health economics at O.P. Jindal University, Haryana, said. “Hence the drop in OOPE.”
Shaktivel Selvaraj, director of health economics, financing and policy at the Public Health Foundation of India (PHFI), echoed Mukhopadhyay, and called the decline an “artefact”.
“You can’t expect that to happen in one year,” Selvaraj said, adding he won’t be surprised if the OOPE goes up in subsequent years – by which time people begin to consume healthcare services at or near pre-demonetisation levels.
The year-on-year decline in OOPE according to the last three NHA Estimates before the current one (2014-2015, 2015-2016 and 2016-2017) was around 3 percentage points.
In reports, WHO officials have implied that the OOPE shouldn’t be more than 15-20% of the total health expenditure of a country. In India, it is almost 50%. The other 50% comes from a combination of Central and state resources, health schemes, urban local bodies and insurance schemes.
In his 2019 book, Make Health in India, PHFI president K. Srinath Reddy had said that OOPEs had pushed 55-63 million people in India into poverty in the last decade. Families in India spend 10-40% of their combined income on health.
The Union government’s Economic Survey 2018-2019 had also described India’s OOPE as a major problem.
Total health expenditure
With the NHA Estimates, 2017-2018, the government also celebrated the fact that public health financing has increased since 2016 – roughly equally at the state and Centre levels. In states, it has risen from 15.75% to 18.11%. At the Centre, from 8.69% to 12.05%.
Yet the current total public sector allocation towards health remains around 1.3% of GDP. So the increase, Selvaraj noted, brings us “no way closer to achieving the goal of public spending to the tune of 2.5% of GDP on health by 2025.”
But both he and Mukhopadhyay expressed greater concern about the decline in per capita health expenditure.
In fact, the total health expenditure per capita (at current prices) was going up in the last four years but has declined for the first time now. It was Rs 3,638 in 2013-2014 and increased to Rs 4,381 in 2016-2017. But in 2017-2018, according to the NHA Estimates, it has dropped by Rs 84.
The total health expenditure as a percentage of the GDP – including public and private spending – has also come down. It was 3.8% in the last three Estimates before the current one; in 2013-2014, in fact, it stood at 4%. But in 2017-2018, it fell to 3.3% of GDP.
Mukhopadhyay said this was quite big in absolute numbers – and explains people spending much less on health in this year.
“Historically, you see if people get richer, in any country, they spend more on health,” he explained. “The health expenditure always increased as a percentage of GDP. It should not decrease – as has happened with India.”
On the flip side, private insurance experienced a boom: it went up as a fraction of the total health expenditure by 11 percentage points. This is the highest increase on a year-on-year basis in the last four years.
The current government has pushed to increase privatisation in healthcare, among other sectors. This trend could become a determining factor in defining access to healthcare services to the people at large, who will be forced to shell out a significant part of their incomes for health expenses.
SOURCE ; https://THEWIRE
Social media is bold.
Social media is young.
Social media raises questions.
Social media is not satisfied with an answer.
Social media looks at the big picture.
Social media is interested in every detail.
social media is curious.
Social media is free.
Social media is irreplaceable.
But never irrelevant.
Social media is you.
(With input from news agency language)
If you like this story, share it with a friend!
We are a non-profit organization. Help us financially to keep our journalism free from government and corporate pressure
0 Comments