On Thursday, the High Court of Delhi asked the Election Commission of India to respond to a plea by Advocate C Rajashekaran regarding the poll watchdog overseeing internal party polls & treating a PIL on the matter as a representation, & said it should file a response by Dec 23.
Chief Justice DN Patel & Justice Jyoti Singh heard the matter, wherein an internal process to outline a standard procedure for party elections was sought.
Lawyer C Rajashekaran said that “There are lacunae in the law with regard to power & tenure of party officials & what happens when they exceed tenure, which leads to larger questions regarding internal party democracy.
On June 14, the news agency reported that the EC was served with a legal notice on June 13 for failing to respond to a PIL filed in the High Court of Delhi seeking fair & transparent internal elections in political parties.
The poll body was given 7 days to respond, failing which, the petitioner Rajashekaran might initiate contempt proceedings against it.
The case dates back to Nov 11, 2020, when Rajashekaran approached the EC, seeking the establishment of internal democracy in political parties. When he didn’t receive any response, he filed a PIL in the Delhi high court, drawing the attention of the court to the EC’s 1996 notice that asked political parties to follow the rules laid down in their own constitutions regarding internal elections.
“The [Election] Commission observed that the various provisions relating to the organisational elections were not being followed by the political parties, & therefore called upon the parties to follow their respective constitutions relating to the said elections scrupulously,” says the plea filed in the High Court of Delhi.
On Jan 12, the HC passed an order in which it asked the EC to treat the petition as a representation.
The notice sent to the chief election commissioner accused the EC of treating the representation with “total disregard”. the news agency has seen a copy of the notice.
The news agency reached out to the EC spokesperson but didn'tt receive a response immediately.
The plea had asked the Election Commission to de-register a political party for non-compliance.
The plea stated, “The lack of intra-party democracy in the said political parties to leadership positions within the said parties results in a unique situation where there is no mechanism for the said political party to be held accountable to its members & its own constitution".
It added that “It is submitted that although most political parties provide for elections through the provisions, the said elections are often an eyewash for established political families within the said parties to continue to retain power as the top leadership of the said party".
According to an Ex-Election Commission official familiar with the matter, the 1996 notice issued by the EC that threatened “legal measures as are available, necessary & appropriate”, including the de-registering of political parties, was issued in the context of lack of elections in the Congress party.
“There were concerns that the Congress was not conducting proper elections & only the Congress working committee was ratifying the appointments,” the former official said. “But the concern was not just limited to Congress. The [Election] Commission continued to monitor party elections post 1996 & granted extensions to other political parties, while telling others to hold elections earlier than the time they sought. Many such orders were passed.”
The timing of the plea is significant, given the internal turmoil in Congress over affairs in Rajasthan & Punjab, & internal elections deferred due to the Covid-19 pandemic.
The party has now said that polls will only be conducted next year, with interim chief Sonia Gandhi hitting out at regional leaders for a “lack of clarity” over party issues.
It is widely expected that family scion Rahul Gandhi will return to the helm of affairs after stepping down as party president following the drubbing Congress faced in the 2019 general elections.
Source Link
Social media is bold.
Social media is young.
Social media raises questions.
Social media is not satisfied with an answer.
Social media looks at the big picture.
Social media is interested in every detail.
social media is curious.
Social media is free.
Social media is irreplaceable.
But never irrelevant.
Social media is you.
(With input from news agency language)
If you like this story, share it with a friend!
We are a non-profit organization. Help us financially to keep our journalism free from government and corporate pressure
0 Comments