STOCK MARKET UPDATE

Ticker

6/recent/ticker-posts

Dismiss with 'Equally Heavy Hearts': HC dismisses plea of Judicial service aspirant who failed to qualify for interview stage by 0.33% marks

 Law

The Delhi High Court recently comprising of a bench of Justice Vibhu Bakhru and Justice Amit Mahajan dismissed the petition of a judiciary aspirant who had prayed for a direction to declare him qualified in Delhi Higher Judicial Services (Mains) Examination (Written) - 2022. (ANIL KUMAR vs HIGH COURT OF DELHI)

Facts of the case

The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, praying that the respondent be directed to declare the petitioner as qualified in Delhi Higher Judicial Services (Mains) Examination (Written) – 2022.

The petitioner could not clear the said DHJS (Mains) Examination and has been declared unsuccessful solely for the reason that the marks secured by him in Paper-I (GK and Language) are below the specified threshold of 45%. The petitioner has obtained 67 marks out of the maximum of 150 marks and, therefore, has failed to meet the threshold required for being admitted to the next stage of the examination – viva voce. 

It was the petitioner’s case that none of the marks awarded against his answers are in fractions; therefore, his marks for Paper-I are required to be rounded off. 


Courts Observation and Judgment

The bench taking note of the facts of the case observed, "This Court would have acceded to the said request of the petitioner but for a specific provision contained in Delhi Higher Judicial Services Rules, 1970, which prohibits rounding off of marks."

The bench noted that Paragraph XIII of the Appendix to the said Rules reads as under: 


 “[XIII. PROHIBITION ON ROUNDING-OFF MARKS Rounding-off of marks at any stage of the examination shall not be permissible. No request for rounding-off of marks at any stage shall be entertained and the same shall be liable to be rejected without any notice to the candidates.”

The bench further observed, "In view of the specific provision, this Court is unable to grant the relief as sought for by the petitioner." 


Social media is bold. 

Social media is young.

Social media raises questions.

 Social media is not satisfied with an answer.

Social media looks at the big picture.

 Social media is interested in every detail.

social media is curious.

 Social media is free.

Social media is irreplaceable.

But never irrelevant.

Social media is you.

(With input from news agency language)

 If you like this story, share it with a friend!   

We are a non-profit organization. Help us financially to keep our journalism free from government and corporate pressure .

Post a Comment

0 Comments

Custom Real-Time Chart Widget

'; (function() { var dsq = document.createElement('script'); dsq.type = 'text/javascript'; dsq.async = true; dsq.src = '//' + disqus_shortname + '.disqus.com/embed.js'; (document.getElementsByTagName('head')[0] || document.getElementsByTagName('body')[0]).appendChild(dsq); })();

market stocks NSC